December 23, 2019
No items found.

Artificial Intelligence May Make HR's Job Easier, but Employment Discrimination Still Abounds

Proponents of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning have promised tools will usher in a new age of digitized work. AI tools can now be used scan thousands of documents and reduce repetitive work tasks, algorithms can predict your shopping habits and recommend products before you even think of them, and machine learning software can be trained to identify cancer from MRIs. Often, the creators and designers of these tools tout AI's supposed objectivity. However, what technologists are less interested in publicizing is how AI can be used to reinforce discriminatory policing, violate civil rights, enable employment discrimination and reinforce class, gender, and race disparities

In a recent New York Times op-ed, Dr. Ifeoma Ajunwa of Cornell's Industrial and Labor Relations School highlighted hiring companies and HR departments increased use of these tools. Ajunwa points out that employers are not merely utilizing these technologies to screen candidates, but  are actively barring candidates from being considered for employment. As an example, she posits a company that relies on a hiring algorithm trained to seek candidates without gaps in their employment. Ajunwa notes, such a stipulation would automatically screen out women applicants who have taken time off for child care or for those who have had long-term medical issues. And, because AI relies on specific rules created by humans, there is no way for the technology to check itself against employment law or ethical norms about employment discrimination. It would simply filter out applicants who don't meet the criteria.

Dr. Ajunwa is not the only one sounding the alarm about employers increasing reliance on AI and other tools, which creators purport to be objective. According to Cathy O'Neil, author of Weapons of Math Destruction, such algorithmic bias is common in hiring, especially in low-wage jobs where massive retail companies rely on sophisticated AIs that consider aspects of your life you would not think have any bearing on employment, such as your credit score, medical and mental health histories, personality tests, and driving record.

In recent years, several lawsuits and investigations regarding AI discrimination have appeared and several researchers in tech have started to develop methods to illuminate the hidden bias in machine learning and AI technologies. However, as Dr. Ajunwa notes, there are few concrete laws on the books that can protect applicants from algorithmic discrimination. Moreover, the Harvard Business Review cautioned that unlike other forms of employment testing, many of these AI-based tools remain empirically untested, leaving the door open to to ethical and legal problems.

New York State Human Rights Law Invoked in Sexual Harassment Arbitration Case

August 11, 2020
Sexual Harassment
A split has appeared in how to handle sexual harassment cases with a New York trial judge ruling recently that the state’s Human Rights Law prevents companies and employees from entering arbitration over sexual harassment. This contradicts an earlier ruling in New York’s Southern District where a judge ruled that arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) supersedes New York’s statutory prohibition against arbitration.

The First Recession for Women

August 11, 2020
Gender Discrimination
There is a new feature to the pandemic-induced recession that has decimated employment, manufacturing, child care, education, and just about every other facet of life. It is women, not men who are the most greatly affected by the force of the shutdown.

The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup: Black Pregnancy in New York City and School Reopening Reversals

August 10, 2020
Race Discrimination
Pregnancy Discrimination
We’re now a week into the expiration of the enhanced unemployment benefits of the CARES Act and the news is not good. Congress and the White House remain at least a trillion of dollars apart on a new deal, with the Senate GOP split, though their prized bit of the CARES Act, the corporate bailout, did not have an expiration date, unlike those parts aimed at protecting workers, such as the PUA and eviction moratoriums. Thus, with depressing predictability, there were a spate of alarming stories this week echoing the fears that tenant unions and activists have been voicing for months: by ending employment relief we are hurtling toward a cliff, over which lies massive, nationwide evictions.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.