January 23, 2023
No items found.

NYC Ban on Automated Employment Decision Tools Revised

In December, 2021, the New York City Council passed a measure that bans the use of artificial intelligence programs designed to make decisions related to employment. The measure seeks to ban the use of these programs in two areas: (1) screening job candidates for employment and (2) evaluation of current employees for promotion without a “bias audit, conducted not more than one year prior to the use of the tool.” Scheduled to go into effect on January 1, 2023, the measure has been revised and clarified by the NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection and is now scheduled for public hearing on January 23, 2023

While use of artificial intelligence (AI) is coveted by recruiters and employers for both the ease of use in finding employees and reducing operational costs, negative unintended consequences have not been adequately addressed. Systematic biases embedded into AI algorithms can perpetuate unfair hiring and promotional practices and imitate human biases. For instance, AI use of past resumes derived from candidates only of a particular gender, race, age, etc. may cause resumes from other groups to be downgraded thus upholding problematic systemic hiring practices. To combat this, bias audits are implemented to independently test whether the tool has a disparate impact upon a protected class (race, ethnicity, sex, disability, etc.). While other state legislatures have sought to curb this issue in both the hiring and promotion process, the NYC measure is among the most expansive. 

Once the measure goes into effect, New Yorkers can expect that employers using Automated Employment Decision-Making Tool (“AEDT”) will conduct bias audits of their AI tools and will publish those audits. Additionally, the law will require that employers provide notice to candidates and employees that an AEDT will be used, specifying which job qualifications and characteristics the AEDT will apply. Use of an AEDT without conducting a bias audit may result in civil penalties of up to $500 on day one, followed by penalties of $500 to $1,500 every day thereafter.

Confirmation Hearings Descend into Farce as Nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson Remains Steadfast

April 1, 2022
No items found.
With an unimpeachable public record, Kentanji Brown Jackson’s Senate confirmation hearings, predictably, veered into farce as Senate Republicans grandstanded for cable news, trotting out various electoral bogeymen, especially Critical Race Theory, and tried to smear Jackson by association.

Governor Hochul Signs Anti-Harassment and Discrimination Bills

March 24, 2022
Sexual Harassment
In front of gender equity and women’s rights advocates attending a celebration of Women’s History Month Governor Kathy Hochul signed a raft of legislation aiming to bolster workplace rights and protections in the state.

Remote Work a Boon for Pregnant Workers?

March 14, 2022
Pregnancy Discrimination
Kessler notes that for those fortunate enough to be able to work from home, the small box containing their faces no longer broadcasts impending parenthood. Instead, women are able to focus on work, an act of normalcy expectant parents who aren’t pregnant have always enjoyed.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.