June 12, 2023

Menopause Set to Be Next Frontier in Workplace Accommodations

A growing awareness of the seriousness of menopause is forcing employers to evaluate how they help accommodate women who are entering it, the New York Times reports. While still too often treated as a taboo subject, even by physicians, more and more women are speaking frankly about the condition and how it affects their lives, including their employment.

As the Times reports, things are beginning to change at large national and multinational corporations, thanks in large part to a movement taking off in England. There, companies like HSBC and Unilever are now certified as “menopause-friendly” by a training firm in England. But the conversation has gone beyond these types of voluntary certification with parliament debating how the national government can create more comprehensive guidance and policies for employers.

This momentum is influencing workers in the United States, which so far lags behind England. Recently, New York City mayor, Eric Adams, has stated that the city must break the stigma of menopause and build better policies and accommodations for workers in the city.

Adams, and other politicians like him, are riding a wave of celebrities and entrepreneurs who are bringing honest discussions of menopause into the mainstream, often highlighting the economic effects menopause has, with one study from the Mayo Clinic estimating that menopause has cost employers nearly $2 billion in lost productivity. Others have estimated the costs could be as great as $1 trillion. Many women report having had to take time off of work to deal with symptoms

Changes remain in their infancy, however, and large-scale changes to employment policies will require concerted efforts by activists, workers, policy makers and politicians, but the conversation has at least started.

Read the New York Times' article here.

The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup: Black Pregnancy in New York City and School Reopening Reversals

August 10, 2020
Race Discrimination
Pregnancy Discrimination
We’re now a week into the expiration of the enhanced unemployment benefits of the CARES Act and the news is not good. Congress and the White House remain at least a trillion of dollars apart on a new deal, with the Senate GOP split, though their prized bit of the CARES Act, the corporate bailout, did not have an expiration date, unlike those parts aimed at protecting workers, such as the PUA and eviction moratoriums. Thus, with depressing predictability, there were a spate of alarming stories this week echoing the fears that tenant unions and activists have been voicing for months: by ending employment relief we are hurtling toward a cliff, over which lies massive, nationwide evictions.

The Week in FFCRA Complaints: Yet More Wrongful Terminations and Retaliation

August 10, 2020
Leave
Disability Discrimination
As we noted last week, employers seem not to have gotten the message on paid leave under FFCRA and the two notable cases that came up this week both involve employer retaliation and wrongful termination against employees who were protected under FFCRA.

The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup: While the Outlook Darkens, We Celebrate Some Small Victories

July 31, 2020
No items found.
The clock has essentially wound down on extending assistance for the 30+ million Americans currently on the unemployment rolls. White House officials and Congressional Democrats remain miles apart, with the latter rejecting a temporary extension of the benefits. There are also huge question marks over issues we focus on, particularly child care and employment law, both of which were in the news this week and are the subject of several of the stories we feature

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.