January 19, 2023
No items found.

Federal Trade Commission Proposes Ban on Non-Compete Clauses in an Effort to Protect Employees

On January 5, 2023, the Federal Trade Commission— an independent government agency tasked with enforcing civil antitrust laws and promoting consumer protection— proposed a rule to ban non-compete clauses in the United States. The FTC proposed the ban in an effort to protect employees from agreements that place unfair limitations on members of the workforce and stifle entrepreneurship and competition. According to the FTC, approximately one in five workers is currently subject to a non-compete.

Non-compete clauses are contractual agreements that limit or prohibit workers from seeking or accepting particular employment, or operating a business, once they leave their current employer. Usually, non-compete clauses have temporal and geographical restrictions and are used by employers to protect proprietary information, reduce labor turnover and to discourage direct competition from former employees. Nevertheless, these clauses can not only inhibit workers from freely leaving their employment, but can result in restraints on pay, entrepreneurship and professional development. Noncompete clauses are generally regulated on a state-by-state basis where some states, including California, North Dakota and Oklahoma, wholly prohibit the enforcement of non-compete clauses. 

This proposed rule, if enforced, may propel employers to seek alternative methods to achieve the same results as a non-compete clause. Non-disclosure agreements, non-solicitation agreements and enforcing trade-secret laws may be useful tools, but likely won’t have as protective an effect for employer’s as non-compete clauses do.  

The proposed rule is open for public comment for a period of 60 days. Once changes are considered following the public comment period, should  a final rule be issued the FTC should certainly expect legal pushback from businesses and employers. 

Is the Third Stimulus the Beginning of a Guaranteed Family Income?

March 11, 2021
Gender Discrimination
Tucked into 2021’s $1.9 trillion stimulus package is a provision that could have life-changing effects for families with children: an expansion and reworking of the child tax credit. Championed solo for nearly two decades by Representative Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut, the idea to expand the child tax credit has gained a new lease on life and more admirers as the pandemic and lockdowns have had a deleterious impact on families and children.

“She-cession” Global, Not Local

March 10, 2021
Gender Discrimination
Whether it is increasing the number of hours spent working, picking up the slack in domestic life, being forced to quit to take care of children or other family, or leaving the job market entirely, women in the US have taken the brunt of the pandemic’s resulting economic crisis, so much so that it has been dubbed the first “she-cession.” The Financial Times has released a survey demonstrating that this is an issue for women internationally, not just in the United States.

Alex Berke Quoted in New York Times Article on the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act

March 5, 2021
Pregnancy Discrimination
The pandemic may be creating a path for the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, which was first introduced in 2012 to become law. This law will help clarify and define the rights of women to receive accommodations in the workplace.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.