September 7, 2023
No items found.

Department of Labor Proposes Changes to Automatic Overtime Eligibility

At the federal level, overtime for salaried employees has been limited to those making up to $35,500 per year. But in August, the Department of Labor under acting Secretary Julie Su has proposed a change to that cutoff, calling for an increase to salaries up to $55,000 per year. The potential rule change could affect over 3.5 million working Americans. 

Automatic eligibility for time-and-a-half has been a focus of US administrations for nearly a decade. The Obama administration proposed a sizable increase only for a federal judge to strike down the change, stating that the DoL did not have the authority to make such a substantial increase in the cutoff, which had been at $23,500. During the Trump administration, the DoL was able to increase the amount to its current $35,500 limit.

One compelling reason for the DoL to pursue this is that many employers avoid overtime obligations by misclassifying workers as managers or illegally prevent employees from accessing automatic overtime by setting worker salaries just north of the current limit. 

The Department of Labor estimates that the rule change will see a transfer of more than $1 billion from employers to workers in its first year. Several large industries, including hospitality and retail have begun fighting back against the proposal, threatening to hire or reclassify existing workers as part-timers to avoid paying overtime.

While this will not affect New York State labor law, where the automatic eligibility is already roughly in line with the DoL’s proposed changes, it is interesting to see another instance of the Biden administration's quest to bend labor law back toward the benefit of workers.

Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup

July 6, 2020
No items found.
Here in New York, the governors of the tri-state area have formalized a quarantine for visitors from the hardest hit states while also mooting any chance of indoor dining in the foreseeable future, which mounting research indicates is a significant source of potential infectio

The Week in FFCRA Complaints

July 1, 2020
Pregnancy Discrimination
Paid Family Leave
Overall, we are beginning to see some patterns in the thematic nature of the complaints. Specifically, plaintiffs seem to be those whose employment has been terminated either after expressing concerns about workplace health and safety (e.g. improper distancing, lack of PPE, and not enforcing CDC-recommended quarantine procedures) and parents whose employment has been terminated because they were unable to locate appropriate childcare or family care.

Returning to Work After Protesting: Employee Rights and Employer Responsibilities

June 29, 2020
No items found.
Some employers may be concerned about the risk posed by the return of employees who have participated in protests to newly reopened workplaces. Similarly, employees may want to know whether their increased risk of exposure could affect their job security, and what their rights are in this situation.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.