April 1, 2024
No items found.

Congress and Lawsuit Threaten NLRB’s Joint Employer Rule

In October of 2023, the National Labor Relations Board issued a final rule pertaining to joint employment, which has drawn significant backlash from congress, which resulted in the House of Representatives utilizing its powers to issue a resolution overturning the NLRB’s rule. According to sources, should the resolution make it out of the senate, the president will veto it.

The NLRB’s rule on joint employers created a new standard to help determine joint employment status for workers, rescinding a rule passed by the previous NLRB in 2020. The new standard stipulates:

- an entity may be considered a joint employer of a group of employees if each

- entity has an employment relationship with the employees and they share or codetermine one or more of the employees’ essential terms and conditions of employment, which are defined exclusively as: (1) wages, benefits, and other compensation; (2) hours of work and scheduling; (3) the assignment of duties to be performed; (4) the supervision of the performance of duties; (5) work rules and directions governing the manner, means, and methods of the performance of duties and the grounds for discipline; (6) the tenure of employment, including hiring and discharge; and (7) working conditions related to the safety and health of employees.

This rule would aid many non-unionized workplaces and sectors, providing increased worker power to those who are employed by subcontractors, a situation in which millions of American workers find themselves.

The rule is primarily opposed by Congressional Republicans who argue it creates undue burdens on small business owners and could stymie job growth although several Democrats, including Senator Joe Manchin have voiced their disdain for the rule and have vowed to fight it.

Outside the capitol building, the rule also faces a lawsuit from a panoply of business groups, including the Chamber of Commerce and lobbies representing the hospitality and retail industries, among others. In February a Texas judge required the effective date of the rule be pushed back into March.

Alex Berke for the Daily Beast: You Know What's Missing from the 'Dobbs' Opinion? Women.

June 27, 2022
Pregnancy Discrimination
Gender Discrimination
The US Supreme Court’s catastrophic and heartbreaking decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, which has guaranteed a woman’s constitutional right to an abortion for almost 50 years, has ignited a blaze of emotions across the country.

NY State Division on Human Rights Alleges Pregnancy-related Discrimination at Amazon

June 6, 2022
Pregnancy Discrimination
Disability Discrimination
The report suggests that Amazon consultants have identified reasonable accommodations that would allow workers with disabilities to continue performing their functions without undue burden. However, despite this knowledge, company officials continue to pursue a policy of forced unpaid leave rather than internally-identified accommodations.

New Report Adds Further Evidence We Need Universal Child Care

May 24, 2022
No items found.
The results of the survey, which polled 1,000 workers, showed that an overwhelming majority (69%) of women looking for work could be swayed to work for a company that offered childcare benefits.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.