February 14, 2022
No items found.

Bill to Ban Forced Arbitration in Sexual Misconduct Cases Passes the Senate

     

After passing the House with an overwhelming majority, a bill that would ban forced arbitration for sexual misconduct claims in the workplace was passed by the Senate on February 10, 2022. President Biden is expected to sign the bill, thereby enacting a powerful update the way to federal employment and labor laws can help address unfairness in sexual misconduct matters.

Arbitration clauses are often buried deep in employment contracts, and many employees don’t know what they’re agreeing too or don’t fully understand what arbitration means. These clauses force employees with claims against their employer to bring them to arbitration—a private process which is often fully funded by the employer itself, and the binding decision is made by an outside arbitrator. Most of the time, employers win these arbitrations and survivors are barred from speaking publicly about their experiences. While some states, like New York and California, already have laws banning forced arbitration in sexual harassment or misconduct cases, this law will apply federally, meaning no one claiming sex harassment can be denied a chance to bring their claims publicly in court.

The bill bans forced arbitration, but that does not preclude survivors or harassment or assault from pursuing that path if they do not want to end up in court. The legislation will also apply to sex harassment claims that are brought in a joint or class action manner and is applicable to claims that arise after and before the enactment of the bill. According to a spokesperson for Representative Cheri Bustos (D-Ill.), “The bill would apply to any new claims, regardless of when the bad behavior occurred and barring any state or local law that might limit when a claim is brought."

The Rhetoric of Choice Obscures Our Social Obligations to Parents

January 30, 2020
Paid Family Leave
FMLA
Pregnancy Discrimination
Leave
Who should foot the bill or take responsibility for social reproduction as more women were pressed into the workforce, government or the individual? In the US, the answer was resounding: the individual. And this has had significant consequences for working parents since. By placing the responsibility on the individual, almost always the mother, parents have been in a bind for decades and any "choices" available reside in an astonishingly thin sliver of options constrained by structural inequalities

NYC Commission on Human Rights Clarifies Work Protections for Independent Contractors and Freelancers

January 30, 2020
No items found.
New York City's Commission On Human Rights has published new information for freelancers and contractors working in the city.

Female Flight Attendants and Pilots File Discrimination Suit Against Frontier Airlines, Alleging Discrimination against Pregnant and Nursing Mothers

January 13, 2020
Gender Discrimination
Pregnancy Discrimination
Two lawsuits were filed against Frontier airlines alleging that the Company required pregnant employees to suspend work duties months before they were scheduled to give birth, forcing employees to use their vacation days in lieu of paid time off, take unpaid maternity leave without Frontier providing alternatives for work, and refuse to accommodate breastfeeding and pregnant workers.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.