February 14, 2022
No items found.

Bill to Ban Forced Arbitration in Sexual Misconduct Cases Passes the Senate

     

After passing the House with an overwhelming majority, a bill that would ban forced arbitration for sexual misconduct claims in the workplace was passed by the Senate on February 10, 2022. President Biden is expected to sign the bill, thereby enacting a powerful update the way to federal employment and labor laws can help address unfairness in sexual misconduct matters.

Arbitration clauses are often buried deep in employment contracts, and many employees don’t know what they’re agreeing too or don’t fully understand what arbitration means. These clauses force employees with claims against their employer to bring them to arbitration—a private process which is often fully funded by the employer itself, and the binding decision is made by an outside arbitrator. Most of the time, employers win these arbitrations and survivors are barred from speaking publicly about their experiences. While some states, like New York and California, already have laws banning forced arbitration in sexual harassment or misconduct cases, this law will apply federally, meaning no one claiming sex harassment can be denied a chance to bring their claims publicly in court.

The bill bans forced arbitration, but that does not preclude survivors or harassment or assault from pursuing that path if they do not want to end up in court. The legislation will also apply to sex harassment claims that are brought in a joint or class action manner and is applicable to claims that arise after and before the enactment of the bill. According to a spokesperson for Representative Cheri Bustos (D-Ill.), “The bill would apply to any new claims, regardless of when the bad behavior occurred and barring any state or local law that might limit when a claim is brought."

The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup: School Reopenings and Employer Liability among Hot-button Issues

July 17, 2020
No items found.
This week includes updates on the latest roadblocks at another round of stimulus, which remains necessary as more than 30 million Americans remain out of work, officially, and countless more are shut out of the social welfare programs offered in the US. We also highlight school re-openings and general Covid risk analysis.

The Week in FFCRA Cases Includes Multiple Worker Complaints in the Food Supply Sector

July 17, 2020
Disability Discrimination
The three cases highlighted in this weeks’ FFCRA complaint roundup include two filed by plaintiffs working in restaurants and another from a plaintiff employed in food distribution. Because the entire food supply chain has been deemed essential, workers in the industry have little ability to leave work to care for sick family members or children since the childcare industry cratered.

Berke-Weiss Law Writes About Free Speech in the Workplace for Law360

July 15, 2020
No items found.
Berke-Weiss Law answers some questions on many New Yorkers’ minds right now in Law360: can I be fired for protesting or posting about politics on social media? Am I entitled to take time off to protest? Can my employer force me to take a Covid-19 test after protesting but before returning to my workplace?

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.