February 14, 2022
No items found.

Bill to Ban Forced Arbitration in Sexual Misconduct Cases Passes the Senate

     

After passing the House with an overwhelming majority, a bill that would ban forced arbitration for sexual misconduct claims in the workplace was passed by the Senate on February 10, 2022. President Biden is expected to sign the bill, thereby enacting a powerful update the way to federal employment and labor laws can help address unfairness in sexual misconduct matters.

Arbitration clauses are often buried deep in employment contracts, and many employees don’t know what they’re agreeing too or don’t fully understand what arbitration means. These clauses force employees with claims against their employer to bring them to arbitration—a private process which is often fully funded by the employer itself, and the binding decision is made by an outside arbitrator. Most of the time, employers win these arbitrations and survivors are barred from speaking publicly about their experiences. While some states, like New York and California, already have laws banning forced arbitration in sexual harassment or misconduct cases, this law will apply federally, meaning no one claiming sex harassment can be denied a chance to bring their claims publicly in court.

The bill bans forced arbitration, but that does not preclude survivors or harassment or assault from pursuing that path if they do not want to end up in court. The legislation will also apply to sex harassment claims that are brought in a joint or class action manner and is applicable to claims that arise after and before the enactment of the bill. According to a spokesperson for Representative Cheri Bustos (D-Ill.), “The bill would apply to any new claims, regardless of when the bad behavior occurred and barring any state or local law that might limit when a claim is brought."

The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup: While the Outlook Darkens, We Celebrate Some Small Victories

July 31, 2020
No items found.
The clock has essentially wound down on extending assistance for the 30+ million Americans currently on the unemployment rolls. White House officials and Congressional Democrats remain miles apart, with the latter rejecting a temporary extension of the benefits. There are also huge question marks over issues we focus on, particularly child care and employment law, both of which were in the news this week and are the subject of several of the stories we feature

The Week in FFCRA Complaints: Employers Do Not Seem to Understand Mandated Worker Protections

July 31, 2020
Leave
Disability Discrimination
t is starting to seem, from our perspective, that either employers have not been made sufficiently aware of the leave entitled to workers under the FFCRA or that they are willing to risk a lawsuit for wrongful termination.

With the HEALS Act the Fight over Pandemic Lawsuits Takes Center Stage

July 30, 2020
No items found.
Earlier this week, Senate GOP leadership introduced their $1 trillion opening response to the $3 trillion Congressional HEROES Act, originally proposed in May. As we have noted, the signal demand coming from Mitch McConnell’s office is liability protection (the “L” in HEALS) for businesses and health care organizations. Translated, McConnell wants to prevent workers from suing employers if they contract coronavirus at work. And the GOP appears firm that without consensus on this issue, there will be no new stimulus.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.