February 14, 2022
No items found.

Bill to Ban Forced Arbitration in Sexual Misconduct Cases Passes the Senate

     

After passing the House with an overwhelming majority, a bill that would ban forced arbitration for sexual misconduct claims in the workplace was passed by the Senate on February 10, 2022. President Biden is expected to sign the bill, thereby enacting a powerful update the way to federal employment and labor laws can help address unfairness in sexual misconduct matters.

Arbitration clauses are often buried deep in employment contracts, and many employees don’t know what they’re agreeing too or don’t fully understand what arbitration means. These clauses force employees with claims against their employer to bring them to arbitration—a private process which is often fully funded by the employer itself, and the binding decision is made by an outside arbitrator. Most of the time, employers win these arbitrations and survivors are barred from speaking publicly about their experiences. While some states, like New York and California, already have laws banning forced arbitration in sexual harassment or misconduct cases, this law will apply federally, meaning no one claiming sex harassment can be denied a chance to bring their claims publicly in court.

The bill bans forced arbitration, but that does not preclude survivors or harassment or assault from pursuing that path if they do not want to end up in court. The legislation will also apply to sex harassment claims that are brought in a joint or class action manner and is applicable to claims that arise after and before the enactment of the bill. According to a spokesperson for Representative Cheri Bustos (D-Ill.), “The bill would apply to any new claims, regardless of when the bad behavior occurred and barring any state or local law that might limit when a claim is brought."

The Week in FFCRA Cases: Judge Invalidates DOL Implementation, Expanding Eligibility

August 18, 2020
Disability Discrimination
Leave
The complaints we found relevant this week are eerily similar—parents who need to take care of their children, some of whom are immunocompromised, are being denied telework or leave or are being terminated. Further, we are continuing to see plaintiffs who voice concerns to their employers about workplace safety being terminated after doing so.

Federal Family and Sick Leave for Covid-19 Expanded by New York District Court

August 14, 2020
Leave
Paid Family Leave
Pregnancy Discrimination
FMLA
S.D.N.Y. Judge Paul Oetken invalidated parts of the Department of Labor’s interpretation of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act in a lawsuit brought by New York State Attorney General Letitia James.

New York State Human Rights Law Invoked in Sexual Harassment Arbitration Case

August 11, 2020
Sexual Harassment
A split has appeared in how to handle sexual harassment cases with a New York trial judge ruling recently that the state’s Human Rights Law prevents companies and employees from entering arbitration over sexual harassment. This contradicts an earlier ruling in New York’s Southern District where a judge ruled that arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) supersedes New York’s statutory prohibition against arbitration.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.