February 2, 2022
No items found.

Workplace Conflict Over Mask Wearing at the Supreme Court

     

Covid workplace safety at the Supreme Court became a story at the end of January, and not just because of the Courts’ decision to strike down President Biden’s vax or mask mandate for large private employers. Nina Totenberg, NPR’s Supreme Court Correspondent, published a story stating that Chief Justice Roberts asked the justices to wear masks during oral arguments due to Omicron, only Justice Gorsuch attended without a mask. Justice Sotomayor, who is seated next to Justice Gorsuch on the bench, has been participating in oral arguments by phone from her office. Justice Sotomayor’s type 1 diabetes makes her high risk for serious illness or death if she contracts Covid. Justice Sotomayor also told People Magazine she wears a mask to protect others, "It's a part of me that has grown up understanding that we have affirmative obligations to take care of ourselves as human beings. Good health doesn't just happen. It's a conscious choice."

This is a scene that has been playing out across workplaces in America, and is poised to happen more frequently as Covid variants continue to change risk analysis for individuals before official guidance is changed. Employees who need reasonable accommodations due to their own medical conditions can request those accommodations, which may include working remotely. Like Justice Sotomayor, even employees who receive their requested accommodations may find themselves separated from their co-workers. Most employees do not even have the protections Justice Sotomayor enjoys as a lifelong appointee to the court. Justice Sotomayor is permitted to work from her office without fear of termination or demotion. Many employees do not receive their requested accommodations, and may lose their job for asking.

The unusual reaction from the Supreme Court, which released two statements on the story -- one from Chief Justice Roberts and a separate joint statement from Justices Sotomayor and Gorsuch -- indicates the Court’s discomfort in appearing to disrespect a colleague.  We’d love to see more open discussions about reasonable accommodations in the workplace, but the topic is, in all likelihood, still in its nascent stage, especially as it pertains to Covid.

     Employees: Contact Berke-Weiss Law if you have questions about requesting reasonable accommodations  

     Employers: Contact Berke-Weiss Law if you have questions about implementing reasonable accommodations  

The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup: School Reopenings and Employer Liability among Hot-button Issues

July 17, 2020
No items found.
This week includes updates on the latest roadblocks at another round of stimulus, which remains necessary as more than 30 million Americans remain out of work, officially, and countless more are shut out of the social welfare programs offered in the US. We also highlight school re-openings and general Covid risk analysis.

The Week in FFCRA Cases Includes Multiple Worker Complaints in the Food Supply Sector

July 17, 2020
Disability Discrimination
The three cases highlighted in this weeks’ FFCRA complaint roundup include two filed by plaintiffs working in restaurants and another from a plaintiff employed in food distribution. Because the entire food supply chain has been deemed essential, workers in the industry have little ability to leave work to care for sick family members or children since the childcare industry cratered.

Berke-Weiss Law Writes About Free Speech in the Workplace for Law360

July 15, 2020
No items found.
Berke-Weiss Law answers some questions on many New Yorkers’ minds right now in Law360: can I be fired for protesting or posting about politics on social media? Am I entitled to take time off to protest? Can my employer force me to take a Covid-19 test after protesting but before returning to my workplace?

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.