February 2, 2022
No items found.

Workplace Conflict Over Mask Wearing at the Supreme Court

     

Covid workplace safety at the Supreme Court became a story at the end of January, and not just because of the Courts’ decision to strike down President Biden’s vax or mask mandate for large private employers. Nina Totenberg, NPR’s Supreme Court Correspondent, published a story stating that Chief Justice Roberts asked the justices to wear masks during oral arguments due to Omicron, only Justice Gorsuch attended without a mask. Justice Sotomayor, who is seated next to Justice Gorsuch on the bench, has been participating in oral arguments by phone from her office. Justice Sotomayor’s type 1 diabetes makes her high risk for serious illness or death if she contracts Covid. Justice Sotomayor also told People Magazine she wears a mask to protect others, "It's a part of me that has grown up understanding that we have affirmative obligations to take care of ourselves as human beings. Good health doesn't just happen. It's a conscious choice."

This is a scene that has been playing out across workplaces in America, and is poised to happen more frequently as Covid variants continue to change risk analysis for individuals before official guidance is changed. Employees who need reasonable accommodations due to their own medical conditions can request those accommodations, which may include working remotely. Like Justice Sotomayor, even employees who receive their requested accommodations may find themselves separated from their co-workers. Most employees do not even have the protections Justice Sotomayor enjoys as a lifelong appointee to the court. Justice Sotomayor is permitted to work from her office without fear of termination or demotion. Many employees do not receive their requested accommodations, and may lose their job for asking.

The unusual reaction from the Supreme Court, which released two statements on the story -- one from Chief Justice Roberts and a separate joint statement from Justices Sotomayor and Gorsuch -- indicates the Court’s discomfort in appearing to disrespect a colleague.  We’d love to see more open discussions about reasonable accommodations in the workplace, but the topic is, in all likelihood, still in its nascent stage, especially as it pertains to Covid.

     Employees: Contact Berke-Weiss Law if you have questions about requesting reasonable accommodations  

     Employers: Contact Berke-Weiss Law if you have questions about implementing reasonable accommodations  

The Week in FFCRA Cases: Judge Invalidates DOL Implementation, Expanding Eligibility

August 18, 2020
Disability Discrimination
Leave
The complaints we found relevant this week are eerily similar—parents who need to take care of their children, some of whom are immunocompromised, are being denied telework or leave or are being terminated. Further, we are continuing to see plaintiffs who voice concerns to their employers about workplace safety being terminated after doing so.

Federal Family and Sick Leave for Covid-19 Expanded by New York District Court

August 14, 2020
Leave
Paid Family Leave
Pregnancy Discrimination
FMLA
S.D.N.Y. Judge Paul Oetken invalidated parts of the Department of Labor’s interpretation of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act in a lawsuit brought by New York State Attorney General Letitia James.

New York State Human Rights Law Invoked in Sexual Harassment Arbitration Case

August 11, 2020
Sexual Harassment
A split has appeared in how to handle sexual harassment cases with a New York trial judge ruling recently that the state’s Human Rights Law prevents companies and employees from entering arbitration over sexual harassment. This contradicts an earlier ruling in New York’s Southern District where a judge ruled that arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) supersedes New York’s statutory prohibition against arbitration.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.