August 21, 2020

This Week’s FFCRA Complaints: The Wrongful Terminations Continue 

This will be our last regular summary of FFCRA complaints for the foreseeable future. Since we started this weekly blog post in May, we've read and summarized over 50 complaints filed under the new leave law. As we’ve pointed out, many of these complaints follow almost a template, with workers being terminated for either taking legally-allowed precautions to protect fellow workers from potential infection or for having legitimate reasons to take leave, often to care for a family member or child. 

Time will tell how many more will be filed before the law expires in December, or whether the DOL will update its implementation to make this leave more widely available. It's also too early to tell whether it will be renewed by Congress in some form, but it's hard to imagine not having this job protection or leave at all if a vaccine is not widely available until early 2021, which is still a quite optimistic projection.

  • Complaint, Bishop v. TRP Constr. Grp., L.L.C., No. 3:20-cv-00447 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 13, 2020)
  • Plaintiff sued his employer for retaliation and wrongful termination in violation of FFCRA. Plaintiff’s spouse began experiencing suspected COVID-19 symptoms and they were advised to self-quarantine for 14 days. In addition, Plaintiff’s children were home due to school closures. Plaintiff notified his employer of this and was subsequently terminated.
  • Complaint, Woodward v. Vancuren Servs., Inc., No. 1:20-cv-1818 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 17, 2020)
  • Plaintiff sued his employer for unpaid wages in violation of FLSA and FFCRA. Plaintiff and similarly situated hourly paid employees regularly work more than 40 hours per workweek and are not paid overtime wages. Additionally they are paid less than the prevailing wage rate required by law. In response to Covid-19, schools were closed and Plaintiff had to take time off to care for his child. While on leave, he came into contact with a person who tested positive for Covid-19. He was instructed to self-quarantine by his doctor and requested more time off. Though he was granted leave, his employer refused to pay him, which is a violation of FFCRA.
  • Complaint, Chinchilla Aguilar v. Europa USA, Inc., No. 0:20-cv-61661-RAR (S.D. Fla. Aug. 18, 2020)
  • Plaintiff sued his employer for failure to pay for sick leave and unlawful termination in violation of FFCRA. Plaintiff experienced suspected Covid-19 symptoms and was directed to stay home and get tested. He tested positive and was required to take leave to self-quarantine. During his leave, he was not paid by his employer. After testing negative, he sought to return to his employment and was told he had been discharged.


Berke-Weiss Law attends City Bar Webinar on Pregnancy during the Pandemic

June 25, 2020
Pregnancy Discrimination
Since the end of March, we’ve spent a great deal of time talking about the economic and social impacts of coronavirus and the lockdowns on working parents, but today we want to talk about how it’s affecting pregnancy. Specifically, what is and isn’t being done to help pregnant women during this incredibly strange and new time.

Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup

June 19, 2020
No items found.
In this edition, we’re looking at several employment-related stories, including more news on the childcare front, new considerations for coronavirus workplace safety, as well as some news about a project in which the Firm is participating.

Title VII Now Applies to Gay and Transgender People, the Supreme Court Rules

June 15, 2020
No items found.
In a stunning victory for LGBT employees and the movement at large, the U.S. Supreme Court has held 6-3 that gay and transgender people are protected by Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which bans employment discrimination “because of sex.”

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.