August 10, 2020

The Week in FFCRA Complaints: Yet More Wrongful Terminations and Retaliation

As we noted last week, employers seem not to have gotten the message on paid leave under FFCRA and the two notable cases that came up this week both involve employer retaliation and wrongful termination against employees who were protected under FFCRA. One was denied FFCRA-mandated time off to care for his four children, one of whom had special needs. The other was denied compensation and subsequently terminated after showing symptoms of and subsequently testing positive for Covid-19.

  • Complaint, Pacitti v. Ricciardi Bros. Old City, Inc., No. 2:20-cv-03734 (E.D. Pa. July 31, 2020)
  • Plaintiff, a driver, sued his employer for retaliation and wrongful termination in violation of FFCRA. Plaintiff requested protected paid leave under FFCRA to care for his four children whose schools were closed as a result of COVID-19. His employer informed him that he could take accrued paid time off or use 10 days of emergency paid sick leave after exhausting his FFCRA leave. When Plaintiff was ready to return to work, his employer notified him that he had been replaced and offered him a different position that required a substantially longer commute from Plaintiff’s residence. Because Plaintiff needed to be close to his special needs son, he had to decline the new offer. However, Plaintiff believed his original job was protected while he was taking paid time off.
  • Complaint, Romero v. Accurate Painting of Northwest Florida Inc., No. 3:20-cv-05703-MCR-EMT (N.D. Fla. Aug. 3, 2020)
  • Plaintiff, a painter, sued her employer, a construction contractor, for retaliation in violation of FFCRA. Plaintiff and her crew were ordered to take a COVID-19 test. Plaintiff started feeling sick before taking the test and did not return to work. She received a positive COVID-19 test and was advised to quarantine. When she inquired about her weekly payment while in isolation, she was informed that she would not be paid because she was already fired.

Additional filing: Complaint, Wright v. Denali Ingredients, LLC, No. 2:20cv1185 (E.D. Wis. Aug. 3, 2020).

Bill to Ban Forced Arbitration in Sexual Misconduct Cases Passes the Senate

February 14, 2022
No items found.
Arbitration clauses are often buried deep in employment contracts, and many employees don’t know what they’re agreeing too or don’t fully understand what arbitration means. These clauses force employees with claims against their employer to bring them to arbitration—a private process which is often fully funded by the employer itself.

Workers Still Lack Security Despite Tight Labor Markets

February 9, 2022
No items found.
The labor market is exceptionally tight, a scenario which has converged over the last six months with what economists are calling the Great Resignation, with a record number of workers quitting in November. In the popular media, the narrative emerging from this phenomenon is one in which workers are in possession of more power than they have been for quite a while, which has resulted in an increase in wages, especially for the working class. The power, however, ultimately remains in the hands of bosses, and many workers’ experiences do not neatly coincide with the narrative.

Workplace Conflict Over Mask Wearing at the Supreme Court

February 2, 2022
No items found.
Covid workplace safety at the Supreme Court became a story at the end of January, as Justice Sotomayor participated in arguments from her office, while Justice Gorsuch remained unmasked.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.