March 25, 2020
No items found.

Questions to Ask Before Making Personnel Decisions

The COVID-19 pandemic has created uncertainty for employers, forcing them to deal with realities of the ‘new normal,’ such as remote work or decreased revenue. On March 21, our firm created a blog post outlining the legal implications employers should consider before laying off employees. In order to best assess which legal issues or government programs may apply to an employer’s workforce decisions, employers can think through the following questions when making decisions about employee terminations, reduced hours, or furloughs.

Decision-making process:

  1. Has the employer identified specific employees who may be impacted by a company decision related to terminations, layoffs, furloughs, or reduced schedules?
  2. What is the business reason for making the decision, both broadly and employee specific?
  3. When would a decision be made? When would it be implemented? Will the decision be rolled out in phases?
  4. What are the short term implications of this decision on the employer’s business? What are the long term implications?
  5. Would the decision trigger the requirements under the federal WARN and/or New York State WARN acts (potentially requiring 60 or 90 day advanced notice)?
  6. What resources would the employer need to implement its decision?  For example, if an employer is terminating employees, does it have the tools and resources to draft and send termination letters and any applicable COBRA notices?
  7. What would be the most cost effective option for the employer?
  8. Would this decision expose the employer to liability? Can the employer mitigate against any potential liability?
  9. What is the employer’s goal with respect to what it wants to do for its employees and what benefits it wants to provide to them?
  10. Do any of the potentially affected employees qualify for the NYS Paid Family Leave? I.e. they are unable to work remotely, and are under a government order of quarantine or their children are out of school due to a government order of quarantine.
  11. How will these decisions be communicated to employees?

Employee-specific characteristics:

  1. Are the impacted employees in a protected class?
  2. How old are the employees?
  3. What work do they do?
  4. Are they non-exempt or exempt employees? (salaried or hourly?)
  5. Is an entire department or unit of employees being terminated? Furloughed? Hours and wages reduced?
  6. What are the demographics and roles of employees not being impacted?

Consider all options:

  1. Can the impacted employees continue to work, at least in part?
  2. Can they work remotely?
  3. Can they work a reduced schedule?
  4. What would a reduced schedule look like?
  5. E.g. would employees be off duty for entire months or weeks?  Certain days each week?
  6. Is the employer looking to terminate employees instead?
  7. Does the employer want to give employees options in the event employees decline to accept what's being offered to them? For example, reduction in hours and wages, or termination.

Benefits:

  1. Would employees who work at a reduced schedule or are furloughed continue to qualify for employee benefits?
  2. Would employees who are terminated receive severance and be asked to sign releases?
  3. What benefits would employers want their employees to get that is available under one option vs. another option?

The answers to these questions impact what legal rights the employees have, what potential risks the employers are taking, and help streamline the decision process. Please contact us by phone at (212) 888-2680, through our website, with any questions or comments you have in this extraordinary time.

Princeton to Settle in Gender Pay Inequity Case

October 13, 2020
Gender Discrimination
Officials at Princeton University have agreed to settle a case regarding pay inequities for 106 full current and former female professors as part of the conclusion of a nearly decade long federal investigation into pay disparities at the university.

Employers Should Heed Doctor’s Advice When Accommodating Workers

October 6, 2020
No items found.
According to Peeples v. Clinical Support Options, Inc., No. 3:20-CV-30144-KAR, 2020 WL 5542719 (D. Mass. Sept. 16, 2020), providing the plaintiff with a mask was insufficient accommodation, holding “a majority of these so-called accommodations are workplace safety rules rather than an individualized accommodation to address Plaintiff’s disability.”

Employers Can Create the Future We Deserve, or Exacerbate Discrimination Against Parents - Especially Women

October 6, 2020
Gender Discrimination
Paid Family Leave
More than 865,000 women “left” the labor market in September 2020, demonstrating that the COVID pandemic is forcing women out of work. One in four women who are still in the workforce are considering downshifting their careers, or leaving the workforce entirely, due to the pressures of work and family care.Employers who are concerned about retaining their employees who are parents, especially mothers, can take some steps to ensure that parents are not forced to “choose” their families over their careers.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.