December 7, 2020

Special Issue of Harvard Law & Policy Review Focuses on Pregnancy

On the 25th anniversary of the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD), held in Cairo, the Harvard Law & Policy review has recently devoted an issue to the special theme of “The Politics of Pregnancy.” It contains numerous responses to and discussions of myriad political issues of pregnancy in the U.S. and abroad, including increased emphasis on maternal health, abortion access, surrogacy, and state intervention into matters of women’s health, including the effects of incarceration on mothers.

Writing in the forward, Nancy Northrup notes pregnancy and issues related to it are an essential aspect of the human rights identified at the ICPD. She continues,“these articles serve as a reminder that the ICPD agenda is not negotiable; it is premised upon fundamental human rights. Governments must be held accountable for ensuring these human rights, both by the people they represent and by the international community,” and makes a call “It is time to revisit the promises made at the 1994 conference and recommit to making reproductive health and rights for wo-men a priority.” We couldn’t agree more, especially as the health and well-being of mothers has been imperiled by the public health crisis set off by the coronavirus pandemic.

In light of our work with the Pregnancy Project and workplace accommodation, several of the essays stood out, particularly Stephanie Bornstein’s “The Politics of Pregnancy Accommodation” and Black Women Scholars and the Research Working Group of the Black Mamas Matter Alliance’s “Black Maternal Health Research Re-Envisioned: Best Practices for the Conduct of Research With, For, and By Black Mamas,” a topic we covered over the summer and learned about in a City Bar event this spring.



The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup: While the Outlook Darkens, We Celebrate Some Small Victories

July 31, 2020
No items found.
The clock has essentially wound down on extending assistance for the 30+ million Americans currently on the unemployment rolls. White House officials and Congressional Democrats remain miles apart, with the latter rejecting a temporary extension of the benefits. There are also huge question marks over issues we focus on, particularly child care and employment law, both of which were in the news this week and are the subject of several of the stories we feature

With the HEALS Act the Fight over Pandemic Lawsuits Takes Center Stage

July 30, 2020
No items found.
Earlier this week, Senate GOP leadership introduced their $1 trillion opening response to the $3 trillion Congressional HEROES Act, originally proposed in May. As we have noted, the signal demand coming from Mitch McConnell’s office is liability protection (the “L” in HEALS) for businesses and health care organizations. Translated, McConnell wants to prevent workers from suing employers if they contract coronavirus at work. And the GOP appears firm that without consensus on this issue, there will be no new stimulus.

The Week in FFCRA Cases Includes a Class Action Suit against the USDA

July 24, 2020
Leave
Four cases came across the wire this week and we have chosen to highlight them all. One case is the first class action lawsuit filed under the FFCRA and concerns potentially millions of people seeking SNAP aid. The three other suits that were filed this week follow a familiar line for anyone who has been reading our updates. People are getting sick or have family members getting sick and are then denied their right to paid leave and are terminated.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.