November 5, 2020
No items found.

Court Rejects Amazon Warehouse Workers’ Safety Complaints

In June, workers at an Amazon warehouse in Staten Island filed a complaint against their employer citing myriad safety concerns related to Covid-19 and Amazon’s failure to protect workers adequately. Specifically, workers were required to increase their productivity to fulfill the massive number of orders coming from the still-employed stuck at home under lockdown orders. This demand required workers to violate social distancing requirements and hinder their ability to perform basic sanitary measures, such as frequent hand-sanitizing.

In addition to asking that they be able to work at a slower pace without employer retribution, workers also argued that Amazon should be required to allow workers to access their paid time off even if it had not accrued yet.

Unique in this case was the approach the workers and their legal representatives took to the suit. They argued not only that Amazon had “breached its duty to provide workplace safety,” but that Amazon’s failure to provide protections to workers could be construed as a “public nuisance.” However, as Law360 reports, a federal judge in New York has rejected the lawsuit, ruling that OSHA, not courts, should determine what constitutes workplace safety and safe practices. 

As we have reported on recently, OSHA has failed, monumentally, to provide any comprehensive guidance regarding workplace safety during the pandemic and is being sued by a coalition of unions representing healthcare and public sector workers. Such sentiments were echoed by worker representatives who stated, “The court's deference to the Occupational Safety & Health Administration should be very concerning to anyone who cares about the health of American workers, given that it has been virtually AWOL throughout this crisis.”

Meanwhile, Amazon has seen record profits since the beginning of the pandemic while it has simultaneously continued its purges of workers attempting to organize warehouse workers and other employees at the company as well as increasing its internal efforts to monitor and track organizers.


The Rhetoric of Choice Obscures Our Social Obligations to Parents

January 30, 2020
Paid Family Leave
FMLA
Pregnancy Discrimination
Leave
Who should foot the bill or take responsibility for social reproduction as more women were pressed into the workforce, government or the individual? In the US, the answer was resounding: the individual. And this has had significant consequences for working parents since. By placing the responsibility on the individual, almost always the mother, parents have been in a bind for decades and any "choices" available reside in an astonishingly thin sliver of options constrained by structural inequalities

NYC Commission on Human Rights Clarifies Work Protections for Independent Contractors and Freelancers

January 30, 2020
No items found.
New York City's Commission On Human Rights has published new information for freelancers and contractors working in the city.

Female Flight Attendants and Pilots File Discrimination Suit Against Frontier Airlines, Alleging Discrimination against Pregnant and Nursing Mothers

January 13, 2020
Gender Discrimination
Pregnancy Discrimination
Two lawsuits were filed against Frontier airlines alleging that the Company required pregnant employees to suspend work duties months before they were scheduled to give birth, forcing employees to use their vacation days in lieu of paid time off, take unpaid maternity leave without Frontier providing alternatives for work, and refuse to accommodate breastfeeding and pregnant workers.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.