November 5, 2020
No items found.

Court Rejects Amazon Warehouse Workers’ Safety Complaints

In June, workers at an Amazon warehouse in Staten Island filed a complaint against their employer citing myriad safety concerns related to Covid-19 and Amazon’s failure to protect workers adequately. Specifically, workers were required to increase their productivity to fulfill the massive number of orders coming from the still-employed stuck at home under lockdown orders. This demand required workers to violate social distancing requirements and hinder their ability to perform basic sanitary measures, such as frequent hand-sanitizing.

In addition to asking that they be able to work at a slower pace without employer retribution, workers also argued that Amazon should be required to allow workers to access their paid time off even if it had not accrued yet.

Unique in this case was the approach the workers and their legal representatives took to the suit. They argued not only that Amazon had “breached its duty to provide workplace safety,” but that Amazon’s failure to provide protections to workers could be construed as a “public nuisance.” However, as Law360 reports, a federal judge in New York has rejected the lawsuit, ruling that OSHA, not courts, should determine what constitutes workplace safety and safe practices. 

As we have reported on recently, OSHA has failed, monumentally, to provide any comprehensive guidance regarding workplace safety during the pandemic and is being sued by a coalition of unions representing healthcare and public sector workers. Such sentiments were echoed by worker representatives who stated, “The court's deference to the Occupational Safety & Health Administration should be very concerning to anyone who cares about the health of American workers, given that it has been virtually AWOL throughout this crisis.”

Meanwhile, Amazon has seen record profits since the beginning of the pandemic while it has simultaneously continued its purges of workers attempting to organize warehouse workers and other employees at the company as well as increasing its internal efforts to monitor and track organizers.


The Week in FFCRA Cases: Judge Invalidates DOL Implementation, Expanding Eligibility

August 18, 2020
Disability Discrimination
Leave
The complaints we found relevant this week are eerily similar—parents who need to take care of their children, some of whom are immunocompromised, are being denied telework or leave or are being terminated. Further, we are continuing to see plaintiffs who voice concerns to their employers about workplace safety being terminated after doing so.

Federal Family and Sick Leave for Covid-19 Expanded by New York District Court

August 14, 2020
Leave
Paid Family Leave
Pregnancy Discrimination
FMLA
S.D.N.Y. Judge Paul Oetken invalidated parts of the Department of Labor’s interpretation of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act in a lawsuit brought by New York State Attorney General Letitia James.

New York State Human Rights Law Invoked in Sexual Harassment Arbitration Case

August 11, 2020
Sexual Harassment
A split has appeared in how to handle sexual harassment cases with a New York trial judge ruling recently that the state’s Human Rights Law prevents companies and employees from entering arbitration over sexual harassment. This contradicts an earlier ruling in New York’s Southern District where a judge ruled that arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) supersedes New York’s statutory prohibition against arbitration.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.