January 30, 2020

The Rhetoric of Choice Obscures Our Social Obligations to Parents

The concept of "choice" is one that has significant effect on many core issues US politics and economics, whether it's abortion, education, or childcare. As Claire Cain Miller pointed out recently in a piece for the New York Times's Upshot, choice appeals to deeply rooted American values, such as individualism and liberty. But the rhetoric of "choice" obscures structural obligations and inequalities that narrow, limit, and in many cases preclude Americans' ability to make positive choices.

Miller's article deals specifically with parenting and how it collides with other obligations people face. In the '80s, a greater number of middle class women entered the workforce in response to economic and social changes in the US. These changes included slowing manufacturing sectors, a significant uptick in college education, and changing concepts of family structure. Miller notes  that these changes raised questions about how to deal with the increased conflict between social reproduction, i.e. raising a family, and the economic obligations of paying the bills in a more precarious and expensive world. Specifically, the question was who should foot the bill or take responsibility for social reproduction as more women were pressed into the workforce, government or the individual?

In the US, the answer was resounding: the individual. And this has had significant consequences for working parents since. By placing the responsibility on the individual, almost always the mother, parents have been in a bind for decades and any "choices" available reside in an astonishingly thin sliver of options constrained by structural inequalities. No strong federal parental leave laws on the books leaves no "choice" at all for a new mother or parents. Without universal preschool or childcare options, they can leave work and hope a single income is enough to get by until kindergarten; hardly an option for single mothers. Moreover, studies have shown that leaving the workforce to perform childcare is a leading explanation for the gender wage gap. 

What would a real choice mean in this context. Actually, it would mean not having to choose between being a parent and working. Instead it would mean ensuring that parents could take paid parental leave and be assured that when they returned to the workforce they would not be penalized for it. It would mean appropriately compensating childcare workers. It would mean providing parents with real workplace protections and requiring parental access to care facilities at work. 

Too Early Retirement

September 1, 2020
Gender Discrimination
Race Discrimination
For some, early retirement is a chance to do something else, to spend more time with family, or pursue a passion put off by work. But for others, early retirement, also known by the euphemistic “involuntary separation,” has been an unwelcome occurrence and reminder of people’s status within the workforce, and this trend has been increasing in recent times.

The Weekly Roundup: Employment Numbers Remain High as Job Losses Persist

August 28, 2020
Race Discrimination
The jobs report, released early Thursday morning, indicates job losses persist, with first-time unemployment claims above 1 million for the second straight week and continuing claims still north of 14 million. This comes as Congress remains on summer recess, having failed to shore up an extension of the enhanced stimulus that was propping up the economy. With the unemployment numbers still shaky, this week we’re taking a closer look at just who is being affected.

Commuting & NYS Workers’ Compensation: What Employers & Employees Need to Know

August 26, 2020
No items found.
Employers and employees who have questions about parental leave should talk to an experienced labor and employment law attorney. Learn how we can help.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.