January 30, 2020

The Rhetoric of Choice Obscures Our Social Obligations to Parents

The concept of "choice" is one that has significant effect on many core issues US politics and economics, whether it's abortion, education, or childcare. As Claire Cain Miller pointed out recently in a piece for the New York Times's Upshot, choice appeals to deeply rooted American values, such as individualism and liberty. But the rhetoric of "choice" obscures structural obligations and inequalities that narrow, limit, and in many cases preclude Americans' ability to make positive choices.

Miller's article deals specifically with parenting and how it collides with other obligations people face. In the '80s, a greater number of middle class women entered the workforce in response to economic and social changes in the US. These changes included slowing manufacturing sectors, a significant uptick in college education, and changing concepts of family structure. Miller notes  that these changes raised questions about how to deal with the increased conflict between social reproduction, i.e. raising a family, and the economic obligations of paying the bills in a more precarious and expensive world. Specifically, the question was who should foot the bill or take responsibility for social reproduction as more women were pressed into the workforce, government or the individual?

In the US, the answer was resounding: the individual. And this has had significant consequences for working parents since. By placing the responsibility on the individual, almost always the mother, parents have been in a bind for decades and any "choices" available reside in an astonishingly thin sliver of options constrained by structural inequalities. No strong federal parental leave laws on the books leaves no "choice" at all for a new mother or parents. Without universal preschool or childcare options, they can leave work and hope a single income is enough to get by until kindergarten; hardly an option for single mothers. Moreover, studies have shown that leaving the workforce to perform childcare is a leading explanation for the gender wage gap. 

What would a real choice mean in this context. Actually, it would mean not having to choose between being a parent and working. Instead it would mean ensuring that parents could take paid parental leave and be assured that when they returned to the workforce they would not be penalized for it. It would mean appropriately compensating childcare workers. It would mean providing parents with real workplace protections and requiring parental access to care facilities at work. 

Childcare and Paid Leave Funding Part of $1.8tn “American Families Plan” 

April 29, 2021
Paid Family Leave
In a speech to a joint session of Congress, President Biden unveiled the “The American Families Plan,” the third part of the president’s push to power a post-pandemic recovery. Along with the $1.9 trillion fiscal stimulus and a proposal for an infrastructure plan that would earmark $2.3 trillion to upgrade roads, bridges, railroads, and the country’s aging power grid, the American Families Plan seeks to fund a wide range of initiatives to address deep-lying problems on the job market that the pandemic exposed, and hopefully help the more than 2 million women who left the workforce in 2020 to return.

CLE Webinar Discusses the Vaccination Pros and Cons for Workplaces

April 16, 2021
No items found.
A recent Association of Corporate Counsel CLE webinar provided an important look at what employers should be thinking about as vaccination efforts here in the US speed up.

New Study Finds No Negative Effects in NYS Paid Family Leave 

April 16, 2021
Paid Family Leave
The results of a three-year study conducted by the National Bureau of Economic Research indicated that paid family leave policies do not have a negative effect for employers.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.