November 14, 2019

Research Shows One in Ten NY State Workers Subjected to Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment on the Job

Researchers at Cornell's ILR School have just released a new report that provides significant, in-depth details regarding who experiences workplace harassment in New York State. The report follows closely on the heels of the state's recent legislative reforms to its anti-harassment laws, which were signed into law by Governor Cuomo in August. As we highlighted in June, several of the bill's key components include new mechanisms for reporting workplace harassment, extending the statute of limitations for reporting workplace harassment, and ensuring employers provide sufficient anti-harassment training.

The researchers, Sanjay Pinto, K.C. Wagner, and Zoë West, utilized data from the Cornell Survey Research Institute's 2018 Empire State Poll that surveyed 800 workers from across the state. According to the findings of the report, at some point in their careers, one in ten New Yorkers, or 1.7 million people, experienced quid pro quo workplace sexual harassment, which is defined as “someone in a position of authority at [their] workplace trying to trade job benefits for sexual favors.” Of those, more than one in five reported it led to a hostile work environment. The survey also revealed fine-grained data about who is targeted for such quid pro quos, shed new light on the extent of the problem in the state, and highlighted crucial efforts by survivors and activists to address these structural issues through legislative, legal, and cultural methods.

Other major findings in the report include

  • 31.1 percent of women and 18.9 percent of men have experienced either quid pro quo or harassment that led to hostile working conditions.
  • New York State workers of color, including those of Hispanic origins, are much more likely to experience quid pro quo sexual harassment at their workplace (13.9%), as opposed non-Hispanic whites (8.5%).
  • Nearly 40% of respondents who experienced some form of workplace harassment said it affected their careers or work.
  • An overwhelming majority of respondents (83.4%) believe state officials and politicians must do more to combat sexual harassment in the workplace.

The Week in FFCRA Cases: Judge Invalidates DOL Implementation, Expanding Eligibility

August 18, 2020
Disability Discrimination
Leave
The complaints we found relevant this week are eerily similar—parents who need to take care of their children, some of whom are immunocompromised, are being denied telework or leave or are being terminated. Further, we are continuing to see plaintiffs who voice concerns to their employers about workplace safety being terminated after doing so.

Federal Family and Sick Leave for Covid-19 Expanded by New York District Court

August 14, 2020
Leave
Paid Family Leave
Pregnancy Discrimination
FMLA
S.D.N.Y. Judge Paul Oetken invalidated parts of the Department of Labor’s interpretation of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act in a lawsuit brought by New York State Attorney General Letitia James.

The First Recession for Women

August 11, 2020
Gender Discrimination
There is a new feature to the pandemic-induced recession that has decimated employment, manufacturing, child care, education, and just about every other facet of life. It is women, not men who are the most greatly affected by the force of the shutdown.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.