January 2, 2018

Different Understandings of Sexual Harassment

It’s clear that we are experiencing a unique cultural moment regarding sex harassment in the workplace. News stories about accused harassers break daily in the news, and the “silence breakers” were named Time Magazine’s Person of the Year. Amidst this constant conversation, a recent Reuters poll demonstrates that not everyone in the workplace has the same understanding of what constitutes sexual harassment.

The poll found that most adults agree that intentional groping or kissing “without your consent” is considered sexual harassment. People were more divided over whether “unwanted compliments about your appearance” or “dirty jokes” would be considered sexual harassment. Under the law, any of these acts can be considered sexual harassment. This poll illustrates a challenge employer’s face: ensuring that their employees behave lawfully both to protect all employees and to lower the employers risk of a lawsuit.

Interestingly, a survey by the New York Times found that 25% of men surveyed admitted to performing one action that could be classified as sexual harassment in their workplace by: telling inappropriate jokes or stories; making sexist remarks; showing sexual material; engaging in unwanted sex talk; making gestures; asking someone on a date after they said no; asking someone to be in a relationship after saying no; touching someone; stroking someone, or; sexually coercing a co-worker. Many of the men did not identify those behaviors as "harassing."

People’s perceptions of what constitutes sexual harassment are not completely in sync with their co-workers or with the law. Clear training and workplace policies are critical to ensure that employees all understand what is acceptable in the workplace.

Employers: contact us to conduct training and update policies

EMPLOYEES: Contact us if you are dealing with sex harassment at work

The Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup: School Reopenings and Employer Liability among Hot-button Issues

July 17, 2020
No items found.
This week includes updates on the latest roadblocks at another round of stimulus, which remains necessary as more than 30 million Americans remain out of work, officially, and countless more are shut out of the social welfare programs offered in the US. We also highlight school re-openings and general Covid risk analysis.

The Week in FFCRA Cases Includes Multiple Worker Complaints in the Food Supply Sector

July 17, 2020
Disability Discrimination
The three cases highlighted in this weeks’ FFCRA complaint roundup include two filed by plaintiffs working in restaurants and another from a plaintiff employed in food distribution. Because the entire food supply chain has been deemed essential, workers in the industry have little ability to leave work to care for sick family members or children since the childcare industry cratered.

Berke-Weiss Law Writes About Free Speech in the Workplace for Law360

July 15, 2020
No items found.
Berke-Weiss Law answers some questions on many New Yorkers’ minds right now in Law360: can I be fired for protesting or posting about politics on social media? Am I entitled to take time off to protest? Can my employer force me to take a Covid-19 test after protesting but before returning to my workplace?

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.