March 16, 2023
No items found.

AI and Compliance, Employers Brace for a Brave New World

Over the last decade, more and more companies have utilized automated tools to aid in hiring, training, retaining. Common examples of this include HR departments using AI tools to screen applications or resumes and managers using AI or other automated tools to monitor worker productivity. Historically, when practices and technologies are adopted rapidly, the law takes time to catch up and this is no different, with 2023 looking to be a year where companies are going to come under more detailed regulatory and compliance regimes focused on AI.

In California, for example, people applying for jobs now have newly granted data and privacy rights, and employers must fall into compliance with the new laws which came into effect at the beginning of the year. In New York City, meanwhile, Local Law 144 will require companies using automated tools and software in the hiring process to give notice to applicants. The same is true of companies that use these tools in promotion. These requirements go into effect in April 2023.

State legislatures in Washington, New Jersey and New York are also considering laws that would define new digital and privacy rights for residents in those states, which would include regulating the use of AI for hiring and requiring employers to notify applicants about the use of such tools. 

At the Federal level, the EEOC has become increasingly involved in addressing AI while the National Labor Relations Board is staking out a position skeptical of the use of automated tools to hire and monitor workers.

Berke-Weiss Law Weekly Roundup

July 6, 2020
No items found.
Here in New York, the governors of the tri-state area have formalized a quarantine for visitors from the hardest hit states while also mooting any chance of indoor dining in the foreseeable future, which mounting research indicates is a significant source of potential infectio

The Week in FFCRA Complaints

July 1, 2020
Pregnancy Discrimination
Paid Family Leave
Overall, we are beginning to see some patterns in the thematic nature of the complaints. Specifically, plaintiffs seem to be those whose employment has been terminated either after expressing concerns about workplace health and safety (e.g. improper distancing, lack of PPE, and not enforcing CDC-recommended quarantine procedures) and parents whose employment has been terminated because they were unable to locate appropriate childcare or family care.

Returning to Work After Protesting: Employee Rights and Employer Responsibilities

June 29, 2020
No items found.
Some employers may be concerned about the risk posed by the return of employees who have participated in protests to newly reopened workplaces. Similarly, employees may want to know whether their increased risk of exposure could affect their job security, and what their rights are in this situation.

Get In Touch

Knowing where to turn in legal matters can make a big difference. Contact our employment lawyers to determine if we can help you.